The guy compared the thought of ritual into the (the fresh new 1910s and you may 1920s) Western society and you will community which have European countries the following: No, it is simply one Western some one, especially of that time period, were more the brand new devotional type, not too particular mindset which demands a sort of results, a sort of high quality for ritualistic work. In my opinion this is not very easily utilized in The united states, particularly in those days; right now I’m not thus sure about any of it. Europeans has a sense of aristocracy, a sense of influence, a sense of decisions, of behaving according to public-cultural activities, your local area besides sloshing your own personality all over the put. And they expect to have greatest sense of ritual.159
However, total their notice runs aside with his center
Kammen’s comment one to “brand new American strategy is thus restlessly innovative on feel fundamentally destructive”160 brings a much deeper inkling of state-of-the-art internal workings of characteristics and you may collectivity. As previously mentioned earlier, getting Rudhyar, people imaginative path pushed in the direction of pioneering creativity potentially attracts inner argument. End during the American people, Kammen contends, will be “therefore available [that], Us citizens is actually aggressive and you will battle is a primary supply of interior conflict”; some other paradox is that they basically “wish chat the language away from strength and you may ‘talk tough,’ all the while worrying the need for a vocabulary out-of community and equilibrium.”161 The newest origins regarding Western jazz, also, mirrored equivalent tensions and you can crashes, within mechanistic and the raw, standardization and freedom, and urban and rural. Because of the very early 1920s, Rudhyar understood inside the steeped and you may multifaceted phenomena regarding jazz, areas of liberty, escapism, depression, and you can protest: Just like the we are forced to contract a great deal which have computers, whenever we escape them i desire a great liberation that 
can simply break through rhythmic independence. Like a beneficial liberation is needed in the Jazz dance among other some thing. It’s sort of protest facing our day to day regimen, our very own bondage to help you hosts. It is produced by sort of involuntary anxiety, a tragic need to escape regarding mechanistic standardization and you will tempo.162
Epitomizing the new intrinsic contradictions in this America’s record, belongings, somebody, and you will people, the above mentioned comment alone includes numerous positive and negative
r aw letter e s s a n d v i grams o r , we letter letter o c e letter c-e a n d e x p age roentgen we e n c e
To show, Ruggles and Rudhyar had a relationship– dislike connection with Schoenberg’s songs; Four Bits to own Band try “mostly of the compositions regarding Schoenberg Rudhyar significantly have reading
signifiers that are appropriate to our understanding of like synchronic intricacies and you will meanings. How is it possible one inside the Rudhyar’s audio returns a confident and a bad element is also exist in addition into the each other graphic and you may technical membership? His bright, active resonances, for the one-hand, and a feeling of restlessness, on the other side; a primary, atonal words, and you can heavy or “pressed” notes and you will body language; a need to study from new ancient therefore the low-Western, and recollections regarding much Eu previous- and the like. As stated earlier, he may envision Europeanness once the a type of chances in order to instinct and you can quality. ”163 Subsequent, Ruggles possessed multiple Schoenberg results within his collection and you can “his marks towards the several certainly mean that he had examined her or him.”164 But the other side of your coin try revealed into the Ruggles’s page to help you Rudhyar: Obviously. It will be the “real tone experience” the all-important question. Music isn’t any a lot better than it sounds. As you state, Schoenberg often seems really in writing. . . . There are fine places all throughout Schoenberg’s performs. . . his melodic range, can be as a standard material, dead, and uninspired, and you may unsustained.165