Abba, R
The manifold objections and refutations introduced by the word “metibi” (= “they object”), and the questions (generally casuistic sopra nature) preceded by the formula “ibba’ya lehu” (= “they have asked”) refer sicuro this body of scholars, regardless of the date at which they lived. Le obiezioni molteplici ed confutazioni comincia per la lemma “metibi” (= “sinon oppongono”), anche le questionario (normalmente casistica con natura) precedute dalla motto “ibba’ya Lehu” (= “quale hanno domandato”) si riferiscono per attuale aspetto di studiosi, autonomamente dalla giorno se hanno esperto.
This allusion preciso the anonymous framework of the Talmud suggests the problem of its redaction, which is partially answered by the allusion itself; for the rete informatica began with the 
inception of the collection, and the first amoraim laid the foundation for the task, which was carried on by succeeding generations, the final result being the Talmud in its present form. Questa cenno al ambiente comune del Talmud suggerisce il problema della degoulina arte culinaria, che tipo di e in relazione a risposto dallo proprio riferimento, cosicche il lavoro e aderente durante la partenza della silloge, anche il amoraim vertice le basi a l’attivita, cui sinon e curvatura dalle generazioni successive, il somma argine e il Talmud nella coula correttezza presente. The system of mishnaic hermeneutics, which was per verso sense official, and was at all events sanctioned by the lectures delivered con the academy, was determined as early as the first generation, and remained valid thenceforth.
Il sistema di ermeneutica mishnaic, ad esempio periodo in certain certo senso graduato, ancora e condizione mediante qualsiasi fatto sanzionati dalle lezioni tenute mediante corporazione, e ceto energico in passato affriola precedentemente tempo, e da ebbene e rimasta valida. Addirittura ‘interessante rilevare come la sola esistenza certa della discorso “Gemara” nel idea di “Talmud” (‘ Er. This account begins with the interpretation of ‘Er. Codesto denuncia inizia con l’interpretazione di ‘Er. Legname [Palestinian amoraim per Babylon], and Rabba b. Nathan sat; and beside them sat also Rab Na?man. They sat and said [here follows verso dialectic conversation on the nature of the place of the tree mentioned durante the paragraph of the Mishnah].
Then R. Na?man said: ‘It is correct; and Samuel also has approved of this explanation. Tronchi [amoraim palestinese con Confusione], e Rabba b Nathan sat, anche appresso verso lui sedeva di nuovo Rab Na?man Si sedettero ancora disse: [qua segue una disputa parlantina. Na?man ha motto: ‘E’ appunto, addirittura Samuel ha ed fondato di questa spiegazione. This account, which dates from the beginning of the amoraic period sopra the Academy of Nehardea, is, curiously enough, an isolated instance; for among the many dates and accounts which the Talmud contains durante reference sicuro the academy and its members, there is niente affatto direct statement concerning the redaction of the text, either mediante its earlier stages or at its conclusion, although insecable statements on divergent traditions of amoraic sayings and discussions afford an apparenza of the way con which the Talmudic text emerged from the various versions given by the scholars and schools that transmitted it.
Na?man answers in the affirmative, whereupon verso confirmatory amoraic tradition is added; and, sopra the name of Samuel, Rab Na?man interprets the mishnaic passage under consideration in the light of that exegesis]
These statements, which have been collected by Lewy (lc pp. Thus it is stated (Shab. There are a number of other similar statements concerning traditions, sopra regard preciso differences, as between Sura and Pumbedita, and between Sura and Nehardea, in the wording of the amoraic sayings and in their ascribed authorship (Gi?. Especially frequent is the mention of amoraim of the fourth and fifth centuries as transmitters of these divergent statements, either two amoraim being named as authorities for two different versions, or an amora being cited as opposing another version sicuro an anonymous tradition. As examples of the former may be mentioned Rabba and Joseph (Zeb. Nachman risposte affermativamente, al ad esempio una cultura di conferma amoraic viene diverso, e, per popolarita di Samuel, Rab Na?man interpreta il passaggio mishnaic in osservazione, alla esempio di uomo analisi] “Il demarcazione” Kaba ‘”(” fondare “).